Tuesday, November 15, 2005

The Truth is, the Song Sucks!

I just saw a segment on Countdown with Keith Olbermann, about this song, which purports to spread the "TRUTH About Iraq". It is from RightMarch.com, where their tag line is "Patriotism in Action"

There is the truly, truly crappy song and propaganda video that they are trying to get air time on the radio, and ultimately TRL on MTV.

Like Keith said, the song wont get played, and the group will say it is due to political opression (or some such nonesense). The fact is, the song sucks.

There is a sample of the song available on their website.

Go listen, if you have the stomach for it.

Interesting ...

Josh Marshall:

So the news is out from the Post now -- both in a statement from Bob Woodward and in an article from the Post. The details still seems sketchy and I suspect we're going to find out a lot more in the next few days. But it now seems that Woodward -- who has long been publicly critical of the Fitzgerald investigation -- has been part of it from the beginning. Literally the beginning. From the Post account it appears that Woodward was told of Valerie Plame's identity before any other journalist by an as-yet-unnamed senior administration official who is not Karl Rove or Scooter Libby.

As Josh says, there is still much information yet to be disclosed, WRT the Fitzgerald investigation, and Woodward's role in it.

Walter Pincus, whom Woodward says he told this information to, when he learned of it, has no recollection of any such conversation.

There are a lot of details that are being held back. Be it by the Washington Post, or Woodward, or Fitzgerald is not known (by me anyway) at this time.

In the immortal words of a (in)famous blogger:

Developing ...

Feinstein Gives Cover to Alito

Argh:

"What [Alito] said was, 'It was different then. I was an advocate seeking a job. It was a political job,'" the California Democrat said.

She said Alito said 1985 was a "very different" time, when he was an advocate for the Reagan administration. As a judge for 15 years, he looks at legal matters differently.

"I don't give heed to my personal views. What I do is I interpret the law,'" she said, quoting the 55-year-old judge from New Jersey.

Feinstein said she believed Alito was sincere.

Oy.

Talk About Rewriting History

Rummy Backing off from Iraq?:

This article from Sunday's Washington Post Magazine is the second major attempt I've seen in the last few months to separate Donald Rumsfeld from the Iraq war. (Here's the other.)

The idea, basically, is that Rummy was more fixated on modernizing the military than invading any country. Iraq just happened to be the country that the President wanted to wack.

The rats are abandoning ship.

Sony Digs a Deeper Hole

Sony Rootkit Allegedly Contains LGPL Software

According to this Dutch article the Sony DRM software (or rootkit, if you may prefer) contains code from the LAME MP3 encoder project, which is licensed under the LGPL. However, the source code has not also been distrbuted, hence breaching the license

At some point Sony should stop digging.

The Abramoff Nexus Widens

Of course Tom DeLay is involved:

And this all happens just after we find out that Tom DeLay asked Abramoff to raise $150,000 from his Indian-gaming clients through a private "charity" run by Abramoff, the Capital Athletic Foundation.

So once again we have the unholy alliance -- DeLay, Abramoff, Griles, and now Norton -- exchanging money and peddling influence hither and yon, using non-profit organizations for purposes that appear to have been anything but non-profit, and generally running amok. Nothing in CREA's charter makes Indian gaming a legitimate part of its mission. It wasn't even registered as a lobbyist. And what does the Capital Athletic foundation have to do with DeLay's need for $150,000 for unspecified purposes?

I wonder how many Republicans Abramoff will bring down with him?

Alito, Was he Lying Now, or Then?

Alito responds to his job application under Reagan:

It was different then. I was an advocate seeking a job. It was a political job.

So, either he lied on his job application when he was seeking employment during the Reagan Administration, or he is lying about his beliefs now.

In either case, he should now be disqualified from service on the Supreme Court.

Thought for the Day

"You can pretend to be serious; you can't pretend to be witty."

--Sacha Guitry

Sony Does the Right Thing (Finally)

In a strange turn of events. Sony admits that their DRM scheme wasn't a good idea.

Not only that, you can get your XCP protected CDs exchanged for non XCP CDs. You can get the list of CD's that had this copy-protection on them here and here.

Sony will be releasing information on how to get your CDs exchanged. So, do the right thing, if you have one of these CDs, contact Sony, and get them replaced.

Texan of The Year

Wow, I am late on this.

Right now Pink Dome is accepting nominations for Texan of the year. Although I am a Texas blogger, I don't really blog much on Texas issues (for many reasons, which I won't get into here).

Nevertheless, eventhough I am not really a part of this, it is still something any of my Texas readers should participate in.

You can find more info at the link above, or send your nomination here with an explanation why you think this person should be Texan of the Year. Nominations will be accepted until 23 November. On 1 December, the person chosen will be revealed.

Bush Administration Drops the Ball, Yet Again

The Bush Administration continues to lead the way, when it comes to extreme incompetence. Yesterday it was the total disaster that was the Hurricane Katrina response. Today it is the lack of flu vaccine:

Once again the country is facing a flu vaccine shortage, but it has gotten little attention from the Bush administration. Health care facilities, schools, and supermarkets are canceling flu vaccine clinics in Arizona, California, Texas, New York, D.C., and elsewhere. As Hillary Clinton noted on November 10, the American Lung Association’s Flu Clinic Locator Web site has been rendered almost useless because so many clinics have been canceled around the country.

Last week administration officials started downplaying the shortage and assuring people that there will be adequate supplies eventually. Centers for Disease Control Director Julie Gerberding claimed the shortage would be temporary; she said it may in part have been triggered by greater demand this year than last, but admitted she had no data to support that. Gerberding announced that 71 million doses had been distributed as of November 10, with a total of 81 million expected by the end of November. The good news, she said, is that so far there have been relatively few flu outbreaks this season.

The good news, is not that there have been relatively few flu outbreakes. The good news is that it is still early in the flu season.

The bad news is yet to come:
The manufacturing problems that triggered last year’s shutdown of the plant were known to FDA officials at least as far back as 2003, when the FDA inspected the facility. If the FDA had forced changes at the plant back then, it might have been ready for full production this flu season.

But the FDA didn't force Chiron to correct its problems in 2003 because its oversight powers had been seriously weakened by the FDA's then–chief counsel, Daniel Troy. Before coming to the FDA, Troy, the first political appointee to hold that post, had spent years suing the agency in an effort to curb its authority.

[...]

But when the inspectors wanted to issue a warning letter to the company, an action that would have told the company it urgently needed to correct problems or face the prospect of the FDA shutting down all manufacturing at the plant and seizing any existing product, they were not allowed to do so. Such a warning would have required not only immediate corrective action by the company, but another FDA inspection in a year to make sure the problems had been resolved.

Instead, senior officials at headquarters decided not to take official action. The company was told it could handle corrections on a voluntary basis, and an FDA inspection was not scheduled for two years.

That deregulation thing is working out really well, isn't it.

"It's Your Fault for Trusting Us"

Tis thusly that we are entering the new phase of Operation Iraq War Justification:

President George W. Bush has suddenly shifted rhetoric on the war in Iraq. Until recently, the administration's line was basically, "Everything we are saying and doing is right." It was a line that held him in good stead, especially with his base, which admired his constancy above all else. Now, though, as his policies are failing and even his base has begun to abandon him, a new line is being trotted out: "Yes, we were wrong about some things, but everybody else was wrong, too, so get over it."

In other words, eventhough it was the job of the Bush administration to ensure that all their ducks were lined up, and everything was on the up and up. Eventhough Congress took what the White House let them see, and based on what little they had, they decided that the White House would be trustworthy, when it comes to taking America to war.

Despite all of that, it is our fault for trusting the White House.

Wow.

Katrina Reconstruction

No one in the media, or apparently in the government is making any effort to ensure that the reconstruction of the Gulf Coastal region is going according to any plan.
Fortunately someone has decided to take that task on: Gulf Coast Reconstruction Watch.


Hopefully the media will soon catch on and pay attention to what is happening.
I won't hold my breath though.

Monday, November 14, 2005

Oooh.. Bill O'Reilly Has A List

I wonder if I am on it?:

I’m glad the smear sites made a big deal out of it. Now we can all know who was with the anti-military internet crowd. We’ll post the names of all who support the smear merchants on billoreilly.com. So check with us.

Just for the record, I support all those causes that O'Reilly thinks are these "smear merchants".

Put me on your list, Billy. I will wear that scarlet 'O' with pride.

Boycott Target

I have had a personal boycott of Target over their policy regarding the dispensing of emergency contraceptives. But now, Target has raised the ante, by playing the hurt party in the Planned Parenthood campaign against Target, and those pharmacists who would deny emergency contraception to women based on the pharmacists personal views:

We're surprised and disappointed by Planned Parenthood's negative campaign. We've been talking with Planned Parenthood to clarify our policy and reinforce our commitment to ensuring that our guests' prescriptions for the emergency contraceptive Plan B are filled. Our policy is similar to that of many other retailers and follows the recommendations of the American Pharmacists Association. That's why it's unclear why Target is being singled out.

Target shouldn't be employing pharmacists who have a moral or religious qualm about distributing medications for which a customer has a valid perscription, and isn't otherwise prohibited from being distributed.

Until Target changes it's policy, there should be a general boycott of Target.

There is more information at Planned Parenthood

Jeb in '08?

Apparently the stench of George is too much for a run in 2008:

Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the brother of U.S. President George W. Bush, ruled out running for president in 2008 but left open the possibility of a subsequent bid in an interview with a German magazine published on Sunday.

He still hasn't ruled out an attempt in 2012 though.

Thought for the Day

"People find life entirely too time-consuming."

--Stanislaw J. Lec

Just Confirming ...

... that Roe v Wade will be overturned:

Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr., President Bush's Supreme Court nominee, wrote that "the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion" in a 1985 document obtained by The Washington Times.
"I personally believe very strongly" in this legal position, Mr. Alito wrote on his application to become deputy assistant to Attorney General Edwin I. Meese III.

If this document is "likely to inflame liberals", I would like to see those inflamed liberals coming from Congress.

Sunday, November 13, 2005

We Do Not Tor, ah ...

no, that's not right:

In an important clarification of President George W. Bush's earlier statement, a top White House official refused to unequivocally rule out the use of torture, arguing the US administration was duty-bound to protect Americans from terrorist attack.

The comment, by US national security adviser Stephen Hadley, came amid heated national debate about whether the CIA and other US intelligence agencies should be authorized to use what is being referred to as "enhanced interrogation techniques" to extract from terror suspects information that may help prevent future assaults.

Oh, nevermind

Thought for the Day`

"Ahhh. A man with a sharp wit. Someone ought to take it away from him before he cuts himself."

--Peter da Silva

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Romney Thought It was Funny Then

KKK remarks get laugh.

To summarize. Mitt Romney was at a fundraiser. Speaker says Democrats are just like the KKK. Mitt thinks that is so funny he thanks speaker for that "very generous introduction".

However, he then decided it wasn't so funny. Govenor Romney, you're right. It's not funny now, and it wasn't funny then.

However, unlike the rest of civilized America, Romney obviously needed to be told it wasn't funny.

Thought for the Day

"A nation is a society united by delusions about its ancestry and by common hatred of its neighbors."

--William Ralph Inge




Some people certainly believe this more than others.

Friday, November 11, 2005

Veterans Day

As a veteran of the U.S. Army, I am familiar with the sacrifices an all volunteer military makes that is similar, yet different from a draft era military. The major difference being that the sacrifice goes from being one of expectation to one of choice.

I cannot adequately put in words what I feel it means. I served in the U.S. Army during the 1980's, having been stationed in South Korea during the 1988 Summer Olympics in Seoul, South Korea. I was never one to parade around yelling "U.S.A., U.S.A.", but being a member of the U.S. Army, imbued me with a certain pride that many who never serve can truly understand.

There are plenty of people who mouth platitudes at our soldiers, marines, airmen, and sailors, who think they know what it means to serve. However, when I see the "Support Our Troops" magnets, or hear people say things like "honor our troops", yet never consider enlisting, or discourage their children from enlisting, I feel a sense of betrayal.

I have promoted the cause of Operation Yellow Elephant here in my little corner of blogtopia. But, I have done it because those who cheer the loudest at sending my brothers and sisters in the military off to fight, and possibly die in far off lands, are the least willing to do the same. People like Jonah Goldberg, and the Young College Republicans, who hold "pro-military" rallies, exoriating people like me for being "anti-American" or "anti-Military" because I dare to question the rationale for sending the military to fight in a war of dubious causes, if not outright lies, makes me sick. Not because I think they love America any less than I do, but because they would so callously send Americans into war, because they want war.

My political experience pre-military was extermely liberal. My grandfather lead the GAIU, and was a VP in the AFL-CIO. He was on Nixon's enemies list, and witnessed some of the worst that our government dealt out to political foes. My father was, and still is, a professor at the university level. The morality that I was taught growing up (pro-worker, pro-education, etc.), taught me that everyone deserves and opportunity to succeed. When I joined the Army, straight out of high school, I was taught so the importance of team work. Nothing mattered more than your buddy. There was the person whose back you covered, and you could depend on that person to do the same for you.

However, one part of the military indoctrination, which gets glossed over, is that you lose your political identity. Political identity doesn't matter. Religious identity doesn't matter. These divisions that define people don't matter when you are in the military. The only things that matter are your buddy, your unit, and your immediate commander. You rely on them, and they rely on you. That is the only way you can expect to survive in combat.

In the civilian world, however, the divisons are much different. Your political identity matters. Your religious identity matters. You don't rely on someone else.

What does any of this have to do with Veterans Day?

Ultimately nothing.

What matters is that those men and women who have served our country, be it voluntarily, or because they were drafted, deserve nothing but our respect.

Our respect means that when they are sick, or wounded, or psychologically troubled, they will get whatever they need. Costs be damned.

Veterans did what was expect of them.

We should do everything within our power to repay them.

Thought for the Day

"Paradise is exactly like where you are right now... only much, much better."

--Laurie Anderson

DeLay is Not Helping His Attorney's

Oops:

The last-minute negotiations between the lawyers and Texas prosecutor Ronnie Earle were arranged after DeLay made what Earle considered a seriously damaging admission about his fundraising activities during an Aug. 17 meeting with the prosecutor in Austin.

At that session, DeLay acknowledged that in 2002 he was informed about and expressed his support for transfers of $190,000 in mostly corporate funds from his Texas political action committee to an arm of the Republican National Committee in Washington and then back to Texas, according to the sources, who spoke on the condition that they not be named.

Those transfers are at the heart of the prosecutor's investigation of the alleged use of corporate funds in the 2002 Texas elections, in violation of state law. In the prosecutor's view, DeLay's admission put him in the middle of a conspiracy not only to violate that law but also to launder money.

Kansas and Science

Ben Sargent:

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Supporting Vetrans, Republican Style

With a big hearty piss off:

On Tuesday — three days before Veterans Day — House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Steve Buyer (R-IN) announced that for the first time in at least 55 years, “veterans service organizations will no longer have the opportunity to present testimony before a joint hearing of the House and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committees.”

I love how Republicans "Support our Troops".

Don't you?

The Wheels on the Bus

are coming off:

House Republican leaders scuttled a vote Thursday on a $51 billion budget-cut package in the face of a revolt by lawmakers over scaling back Medicaid, food stamp and student loan programs.

Note, that the "lawmakers" are primarily Republican.

Are we witnessing the total collapse of the GOP agenda?

Add Me to the List

I know I am a very small fish in the blogging ocean, certainly as compared to Atrios, Kos, Red State, and most others. But I want to add my voice (small though it is) to the growing cacophony against H.R. 4194.

Mike Krempasky of Red State and I have jointly signed a letter (PDF) urging the U.S. House of Representatives to reject H.R. 4194 -- a stealth effort to regulate online political voices by pretending to defend them.

Alito Trustworthy?

Maybe not:

When Alito became a federal appeals court judge in 1990, he promised to recuse himself from cases involving Vanguard mutual funds, because he had personal investments through the company. Yet he participated in a case decided in 2002 involving Vanguard.

Alito was ultimately removed from the case because of his conflict with Vanguard.

After he was removed from the case, he complained about being removed from the exact type of case he said he would recuse himself from.

How can he be trusted to not get involved in cases in which there is an obvious conflict of interest?

If history is any judge, I'd say he can't be trusted to do so.

As the Worm Turns

Political quicksand:

According to the poll, Bush’s approval rating stands at an all-time low of 38 percent, a one-point decline since October; in fact, this is the third consecutive NBC/Journal survey showing Bush at an all-time low on his job approval. And it doesn’t stop there: Approval for his handling of the economy (34 percent), foreign policy (35 percent), terrorism (39 percent), and Iraq (32 percent) have all hit rock bottom.

Falling, falling, falling.

Thought for the Day

"She had a pretty gift for quotation, which is a serviceable substitute for wit."

--W. Somerset Maugham

Typical Republican Overreach

Feeling emboldened by successfully preventing gay couples from getting married in Texas (which they already couldn't do), the Religious Right thinks they can fix the divorce rate in Texas:

Rep. Warren Chisum, who wrote the amendment, Proposition 2, endorsed by Texas voters by a ratio of more than 3-1, said Wednesday that it's too easy for spouses to split up. The state should consider repealing or modifying its no-fault divorce law, the Pampa Republican said.

"Gee whiz, our divorce rate's higher than New York," Mr. Chisum said. He proposed that between now and their next regular session in 2007, lawmakers study ways "to make marriage thrive more in our state."

Rep. Chisum is right. Divorce should be banned, just like Gay Marriage.

Divorce does more to damage marriage than homosexual couples marrying.
I think also, there should be jail time for adulterers as well. Adultery is one of the prime causes of divorce. If adulterers are punished for their infidelity with jail time, that should help.

Also, women in the workplace tends to cause men to have these adulterous thoughts. How many men cheated on their wives with their female secretaries or administrative assistants? Maybe if women were prohibited from working in the same office as men, these things, which lead to divorce, wouldn't happen.

Another place that women tempt men into cheating on their spouses is bars. I think that we should require that a bar allow only men or only women. That way, if an man wants to go and have a couple of drinks with his friends, then there is no way he can be tempted towards infidelity with another woman while under the influence of alcohol. How many men go to the mall, and wander past the entrance to Victoria's Secret, or Fredrick's of Hollywood? What impure thoughts do they feel there. Maybe we should have only malls for women that have approved stores for only modest underwear, and malls only for men, which sell just denim and flannel. No more thongs, or lacy bras, or anything like that.

Those evil New Yorkers know how to have a happy marriage. We Texans cannot allow this. We will have a lower divorce rate in Texas, even if we have to force people to stay married at gun point!

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Republicans Investigating Republicans

or not:

The chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence told Senate leaders yesterday that Congress should hold off on a probe of the disclosure of classified information on secret prisons to The Washington Post until the Justice Department completes its own inquiry.

Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) said he will "respectfully" request that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) back off a strongly worded request that a bicameral investigation into the disclosure be convened immediately. Frist spokeswoman Amy Call said the majority leader had not decided how to respond. "He always takes what his chairmen say into consideration," she said.

Frist and House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) surprised both Roberts and House intelligence committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.) with a joint letter demanding a House-Senate inquiry after the Nov. 2 publication of a Post article detailing a web of secret prisons in Eastern Europe and elsewhere, maintained by the CIA to detain suspected terrorists.

So Much for the Denials

US Army Admits Use of White Phosphorus as Weapon:

"WP [i.e., white phosphorus rounds] proved to be an effective and versatile munition. We used it for screening missions at two breeches and, later in the fight, as a potent psychological weapon against the insurgents in trench lines and spider holes when we could not get effects on them with HE. We fired 'shake and bake' missions at the insurgents, using WP to flush them out and HE to take them out."

Oy.


There's more at the link.

Buh-Bye Now

and not a moment too soon:

The New York Times and Judith Miller, a veteran reporter for the paper, reached an agreement today that ends her 28-year career at the newspaper and caps more than two weeks of negotiations over the conclusion of a tumultuous episode.

"At Least We're Not Democrats!"

Is apparently the new rallying cry in the White House bid to save Cheney's reputation:

With Vice President Dick Cheney under mounting fire, his office together with the White House and the Republican Party responded with a coordinated counter-attack on Tuesday, accusing Sen. Harry Reid of malicious conduct "unbecoming" his role as Democratic leader.

[...]

McClellan decried Reid's "rants" as "unbecoming of a leader of any party," and said Americans would question "whether Democrats are more concerned about the peoples' priorities or scoring political points at the expense of a dedicated public servant."

Schmidt called Reid's comments "unconscionable personal attacks and malicious," adding: "These are beneath the office of the Democratic leader."

Added George Bush: "And Reid's a big old meanie, too!"

Ben Sargent

Ben Sargent:


Thought for the Day

"Acquaintance, n.: A person whom we know well enough to borrow from, but not well enough to lend to."

--Ambrose Bierce

What is Wrong with Kansas?

Wingnuts dumb down their children:

At the risk of re-igniting the same heated nationwide debate it sparked six years ago, the Kansas Board of Education approved new public school science standards Tuesday that cast doubt on the theory of evolution.

The 6-4 vote was a victory for "intelligent design" advocates who helped draft the standards. Intelligent design holds that the universe is so complex that it must have been created by a higher power.

Someone in Kansas now needs to file a federal suit to have the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster taught in Kansas Schools.



May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage

Political Capital? Spent.

Democrats Win.

Despite the gay marriage amendment passing in Texas, Democrats did pretty well yesterday. Corzine handily won, what was thought to be a close governors race in New Jersey. In the biggest stunner to Bush and the GOP, Tim Kaine won the gubernatorial race in solidly Republican Virginia. This despite Bush himself campaigning for Kilgore Monday.

As if that wasn't enough, Atrios points us to the Mayoral race in St. Paul, Minnesota. Democrat Mayor Randy Kelly was ousted by Democratic challenger Chris Coleman. Why, you may ask, would this be important to Democrats?

From 2 August, 2004:

St. Paul Mayor Randy Kelly broke Democratic Party ranks on Sunday to announce his support for President Bush's re-election.

"George Bush and I do not agree on a lot of issues," Kelly said in a statement. "But in turbulent times, what the American people need more than anything is continuity of government, even with some imperfect policies."

Kelly, who said he's remaining a Democrat, said the economy is going in the right direction. "There's no reason to believe a change of course will produce better or quicker results," he said.

Well, Tuesday's result showed what that got him:
In a race dominated by partisan payback, St. Paul voters swept former City Council Member Chris Coleman into the mayor's office Tuesday, as Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak cruised to a convincing victory.

[...]

The St. Paul race was overshadowed by partisan fury over Kelly's decision to endorse President Bush for reelection in 2004. A number of polls showed Kelly fighting a backlash in the largely DFL town over the endorsement. A Star Tribune Minnesota Poll showed that nearly two-thirds of likely voters said Kelly's decision to campaign for Bush influenced their choice of candidate.

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Will He or Won't He

Frist and Hastert want to investigate who leaked potentially classified information about the "black site" prison network the CIA maintains, then this happens:

Hastert and Frist make a big show of calling for an investigation into a leak allegedly affecting national security -- the locations of secret "black site" torture prisons. And then -- BOOM!!! Lott just said, Tuesday afternoon, that he thinks it was a GOP Senator who leaked the info to the Washington Post last week. He says the details had been discussed at a GOP Senators-only meeting last week, and that many of those details made it into the WaPo story.

Money quote from Lott; "We can not remain silent. We have met the enemy, and it is us."


In light of this new information, Frist starts hemming and hawing about the investigation. Until, I suspect, he got a phone call or three from people letting him know in just how much jeopardy his job is.

As a result, Frist finally caves:
HENRY: Good evening, Lou, again. That's right, Now Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist in the last half hour now has actually signed this letter, officially launching the congressional investigation. It is a letter basically from Speaker Dennis Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist to the House and Senate intelligence committee chairman, saying they want a bicameral -- it means basically both chambers -- investigating whether or not classified information made it into this "Washington Post" report last week about secret prisons holding terror suspects.

This was on Lou Dobbs show. Long after his self imposed deadline of 18:00 EST for signing the letter initiating the investigation.

It will be quite interesting to see if anything comes out of this Republicans investigating Republicans investigation.

Can't Say I'm Surprised

Religious Right Win:

Texas became the 19th state to approve a constitutional ban of gay marriage as voters decided nine proposed amendments today.

Something like 77% in favor of Proposition 2.

I wish I could say that Texans were better than this, but that would have been too much to hope for.

U.S. Denies Using White Phosphorus

Not unexpected, I 'm sure:

The U.S. military in Iraq denied a report shown on Italian state television on Tuesday saying U.S. forces used incendiary white phosphorus against civilians in a November 2004 offensive on the Iraqi town of Falluja.

It confirmed, however, that U.S. forces had dropped MK 77 firebombs -- which a documentary on Italian state-run broadcaster RAI compared to napalm -- against military targets in Iraq in March and April 2003.

The problem with this denial at this point, is that there is absolutely no reason to believe that what the Pentagon is saying is true.

So much that was was said during the run up to the war, and said repeatedly since, has been proven to be false. The current leadership is too untrustworthy to be believed.

It is bad enough that the Marines were dropping napalm, and now with the allegations of White Phosphorus being used as a weapon against human targets (and civilian ones at that), what can we believe?

Dobson's World

From James Dobson's hometown:

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. -- A former coach at a Colorado Springs high school faces charges of hosting a sexually oriented party for teenagers that led to child pornography.

Marsha Ann Williams, 45, posted a $1,000 bond Saturday after her arrest last Friday. She is under investigation for contributing to the delinquency of minors, according to police.

Williams is a former coach at Mitchell High School.

About 10 girls between the ages of 14 and 16 attended the Jan. 21 part at Williams' Colorado Springs home, according to an arrest affidavit.

Thought for the Day

"We are here on Earth to do good to others. What the others are here for, I don't know."

--W. H. Auden

Tom DeLay, Victim of His Own Success

Or so he'd have you believe.

The problem, according to DeLay's lawyer is that Travis county, where his trial is being held, has such animosity towards DeLay, that he cannot get a fair trial here.

Problem number one, is that 40 affidavits filed by DeLay's attorney that he could not get a fair trial in Austin, came from 40 strong supporters of DeLay, who ultimately want to see the trial moved to a venue where the jury pool would be guaranteed to be pro-Tom DeLay. Problem number two, which DeLay, nor his lawyer can avoid, is that Travis county went to Democrats in the past two Senate races by two-tenths of one percent, hardly the "... the last enclaves of the Democratic Party in Texas.".


Perrspectives for more information on the DeLay trial.



Thanks to Talk Left for the Houston Chronicle link.

U.S. Used Chemical Weapons

According to Italian news reports, the US Army used White Phosphorus against insurgent, and civilian populations in Falluja right after the elections last November.

For those who aren't familiar with what effect White Phosphorus has, it oxidized into a number of different compounds, one of which is phosporic acid when exposed to water (of which the human body is mostly composed).

There is a video of the Italian news program here, and supposedly it is rather graphic in nature.

AmericaBLOG has some thoughts.

As does Daily Kos

And CorrenteWire

Apparently White Phosphorus is not considered a chemical weapon, but it is still highly corrosive to human tissue, and should be banned as a weapon.

Fearmongering, Local Edition

This is ridiculous.

We do everything we can to keep sex offenders away from our kids and then allow them in neighborhood schools on election day.

How could this be?

On election day, sex offenders in Travis Country get into our schools. They are sent there to vote.

It's happening all over the state -- even in Austin.

They can't live within 1,000 feet of our schools. On election day, sex offenders are welcomed into those schools to vote.

How about this boogey man. A person who is a registered sex offender, and is legally able to vote in Texas elections, shouldn't be allowed to vote because the polling station just happens to be in a school?

In order to ratchet up the manufactured outrage, they interviewed a few people, and probably told them that sex offenders are legally allowed to come in contact with their children or grandchildren, or some such nonesense.

The local stations here in Austin, have been rapped in the past for making up news if things were too slow. It sounds like manufacturing outrage is another one of their tricks.

Monday, November 07, 2005

Tuesday, Election Day

For those that are missing their calender, that is tomorrow (or today if you are reading this tomrrow as I posted this kind of late).

I have received a couple of robo calls telling me which way I need to vote on Proposition 2.

I voted on Friday, so I don't have to wait through the massive (not) lines that we will see tomorrow. If you are reading this, and have not voted, do so.

There are elections happening in a number of states, some of which are kind of important, so if there is an election happening in your area, vote.

I'll Believe it When I See It

I think this article is more of a ploy to scare Republican voters out to the polls:

One year before the 2006 midterm elections, Republicans are facing the most adverse political conditions of the 11 years since they vaulted to power in Congress in 1994. Powerful currents of voter unrest -- including unhappiness over the war in Iraq and dissatisfaction with the leadership of President Bush -- have undermined confidence in government and are stirring fears among GOP candidates of a backlash.

Interviews with voters, politicians and strategists in four battleground states, supplemented by a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, found significant discontent with the performance of both political parties. Frustration has not reached the level that existed before the 1994 earthquake, but many strategists say that if the public mood further darkens, Republican majorities in the House and Senate could be at risk.

There may be a genuine backlash against Republicans brewing. However I am not sure that it will be on the scale of the Republican take over of congress in the 90's.

Maybe by 2008 that will happen, but I think people in general are still too scared of the brown-skinned threat that the Republicans like to keep people under. Be it terrorism, or illegal immigration, there is a concerted effort to keep people scared, and the media is a big enabler of this strategy.

The real test comes next November.

What? David Brooks Makes Stuff Up?

Say it isn't so!

SHIELDS: And George Bush was to be this pillar of integrity. He is now seen as morally and ethically inferior to Bill Clinton.

BROOKS: Yeah, but it's not irreversible. I mean, Clinton was much lower than Bush is now. Reagan was lower in Iran Contra.

SHIELDS: Not in the job ratings.

BROOKS: Well, they were in the 20s. But the point is, you've got to make some changes. And when you go back and read about the Reagan administration, you realize how fluid it was. They really did make big changes.

Thought for the Day

"It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it."

--Steven Wright

Even More Republican Dirty Tricks

Fresh on the heels on one revelation of Kilgore's dirty tricks in Virginia, we find out about more Republican dirty tricks:

In yet the latest Republican dirty trick, people in Northern Virginia — myself included — are getting calls purporting to be from the Kaine campaign. However, at the end of the message it says “Paid for by Honest Leadership for Virginia PAC.” Wait a minute, what on earth is THAT?

That PAC is one affiliated with Florida Governor Jeb Bush.

I supposed even the Republican party has come to the realization that they are on the losing side.



Thanks to kos for the tip.

Finally, Congress Does Something Right

I know that it has been a long time since Congress has done something that is in the best interest of Americans, but finally they did.

Contending that the Supreme Court has undermined a pillar of American society -- the sanctity of the home -- the House overwhelmingly approved a bill Thursday to block the court-approved seizure of private property for use by developers.

The bill, passed 376-38, would withhold federal money from state and local governments that use powers of eminent domain to force businesses and homeowners to give up their property for commercial uses.

I realize that this is just the House of Representatives, and hopefully the Senate will pick up this cause. The issue is that as long as the law does not specify what constitutes "the public good" instances such as what fueled Kelo v. City of New London will continue.

This is but the first step of fixing the problems with eminent domain. The state legislatures must define under what cases eminent domain can be used to sieze a property. Right now, what the city of New London did is legal, and it shouldn't be.

A Tale of Two Headlines

Bush declares: 'We do not torture'

Senate, Cheney split over ban on torture

Both AP stories.

Only one is correct.

Hiding Behind Others

Bush had an opportunity to confront Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez directly with his concerns while he was in Argentina. Instead Bush runs and hides in Brazil to target Chavez:

BRASILIA, Nov. 6 - President Bush, in tough remarks aimed at Venezuela's leftist president, Hugo Chavez, called on Latin America today to choose between two competing futures - an American-supported "vision of hope" and another that "seeks to roll back the democratic progress of the past two decades."

Such a democratic retrenchment, the president said, would be "playing to fear, pitting neighbor against neighbor, and blaming others for their own failures to provide for their people."

Mr. Bush spoke before Brazilian business leaders, diplomats and students at the luxury Blue Tree Park Hotel, in an isolated section of the capital, and did not mention Mr. Chavez by name.

But his barbs at the populist president were clear, and were in effect Mr. Bush's response to the fiery populist who led an anti-American rally of more than 25,000 people on Friday in Mar Del Plata, Argentina, while Mr. Bush was attending a summit meeting there.

I mean really.

Bush is all macho man tough. However, put him in the same room with Chavez, and I am willing to bet he keeps his mouth shut. Check that. He was in the same room, and kept his mouth shut.

What happened to the "tough guy"?

Moving From I Forgot, to You Suck

According to TalkLeft, Libby's defense strategy has moved from the "I can't remember" strategy to one where he blames reporters for getting caught:

"It's Mr. Libby's right to a fair trial versus editorial privileges, and that isn't a close question," said one attorney closely involved in the case. "Most judges will say the right to a fair trial wins. ... We're over the hump of the identity" of secret sources, the attorney added. "Now we're talking about credibility" of the reporters.

Interesting how bad things are never the fault of the Bush administration official who does said bad thing.

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Tuesday, Election Day

So far 8.3 percent in Travis County, 1.42 percent in El Paso County for early voters.

This is a low turnout election, with only constitutional amendments on the ballot. If enough come out to vote in opposition to proposition 2, it may fail.

And that would be a Good Thing.

Thought for the Day

"Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself."

--Leo Tolstoy

Republican Dirty Tricks

The Governors election in Virginia is getting rather nasty. So nasty, in fact, that the Republican candidate resorts to pretending to be a Democrat to get votes:

The flyer pits independent (and former Republican) Russ Potts against Democrat Tim Kaine. On issues of Choice, Gays, and Guns, the flyer claims that Potts is a great progressive while Kaine is against all that. So who put this together, this guide pretending to be an "official" Democratic Party guide urging Democrats and Progressives to vote against the Democratic candidate?

Virginians for Jerry Kilgore.

Oh how sad. The Republican candidate has so little to run on, that he feels it necessary to try and fool voters into thinking the Democratic Party is opposed to the Democratic candidate.

Having lived in Virginia for a few years in the past, I can't say I am surprised someone thinks that would work.

AEI and Ahmed Chalabi

Ahmed Chalabi was the primary source of information that was used by the Bush administration to invade Iraq. We now know that the information he provided was patently false.

In light of all of this, the American Enterprise Institute decides to host a speech for him. Most members of the Bush administration are members of AEI, they even have a letter from Bush about how great AEI is.

There is plenty of information about Chalabi's past, but more importantly, he was in Iran last week ostensibly to tell the Iranian deputy prime minister to stay out of Iraq' business. Based on past dealings with him, I wonder if we can believe what he says?




Thanks to Steve at The Washington Note for the heads up.

Saturday, November 05, 2005

12 vs. 3000

This is the number of KKK vs. Counterprotestors that showed up for today's hatefest downtown:

There was a showdown Saturday over a proposed state constitutional ban of same-sex marriage that put a small Ku Klux Klan group against a massive rally by opponents.

Only about a dozen members of the American White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan appeared at Austin City Hall for the group's “pro-family values'' rally. None wore the traditional hoods or robes of the white supremacist group. Some displayed Confederate flag symbols.

[...]

About 3,000 counter demonstrators were drawn to oppose the hate group at City Hall.

More than 200 police officers patrolled the area. Two arrests were made - one for an outstanding warrant and another for carrying a club and creating disturbance.

Bwuhahahah

The Lies Were Intentional

I suppose coming from the position that I didn't really believe the Bush administration and their rationale used to justify the war in Iraq, I personally cannot get too worked up over the revelations that the evidence was made up out of whole cloth. However, I know that the majority of America was not paying that much attention, and accepted that what they were told, was enough truth that many could make the leap to accepting the war's reasons.

However, now that the information is starting to come out that not only was the information knowningly false, but the information was obtained from tortured prisoners, whose motives were not questioned, nor was any of the information obtained via these methods validated.

The incompetence of the Bush administration is stunning in its depth and breadth.

Thought for the Day

"The mind of a bigot is like the pupil of the eye. The more light you shine on it, the more it will contract."

--Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.

Friday, November 04, 2005

Abramoff Investigation Widening

Rep. Bob Ney receives subpeona.

My goodness.

Friday Dog Blogging, Dog-napping Edition

Prize winning English Bulldog Re-Ha Chili Bean was dog-napped at gunpoint in Atlanta this past week.



A show dog from Pennsylvania, Suzie's handlers brought her to Metro Atlanta to compete in a dog show being held in Marietta.

Now, Sandy Springs is peppered with flyers asking for help finding Suzie. The show dog, whose registered name is Re-Ha Chili Bean, was stolen at gunpoint early Wednesday, authorities said. There has been one reported sighting of the dog since she was stolen, authorities said.

Suzie's handlers were on their way from Asheville, N.C., to enter her in a dog show in Marietta. They stopped at a shopping plaza on Roswell Road and Hammond Drive to let the dog out, and that's when they were held up at gunpoint, Fulton County police said.

“Two subjects approached from behind, demanding money. When she told them she didn’t’ have any money, one of them took the dog,” said Fulton Officer Gary Syblis.






Thanks to Moden Pooch for the link.

Let He Who Is Without Sin

Ben Sargent


Thought for the Day

"To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all."

--Peter McWilliams

Saving Money by Screwing Americans

For that's how Congress thinks:

The Senate approved sweeping deficit-reduction legislation last night that would save about $35 billion over the next five years by cutting federal spending on prescription drugs, agriculture supports and student loans, while clamping down on fraud in the Medicaid program.

The measure would also open Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, a long-sought goal of the oil industry that took a major step forward after years of political struggle. A bipartisan effort to strip the drilling provision narrowly failed.

I suppose all of these are less important then that bridge to nowhere that is being built in Alaska. Helping kids get into college is less important. Helping the poor obtain medical care is less important. We can't have that bridge, AND tax cuts for the wealthy unless we screw the poor.



Thanks to Sean-Paul at The Agonist for the link.

I Voted, How About You?

Today is the last day for early voting in this election. There are 9 propositions on the ballot, including the nefarious Proposition 2.

Get out and vote. If you can't get out today, regular voting is on Tuesday 8 November.

Thursday, November 03, 2005

Cover Up Congress Indeed

Pelosi:

Today, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi introduced a privileged resolution to demand that Republican Congressional leadership conduct a thorough investigation of abuses relating to the Iraq War. The resolution failed by a party line vote, 220 to191, when Republicans unanimously moved to table, or effectively kill, the resolution.

"A vote to table is a vote to cover-up," Pelosi said. "Congress has the responsibility to find out why so many things in Iraq have gone so terribly wrong. That is why I asked the House to investigate abuses relating to Iraq. Yet, Republicans again thwarted efforts to answer the questions of the American people. This Republican cover-up Congress refuses to live up to its oversight responsibility."

"Congress has an obligation to identify and correct the problems that led to the production of flawed intelligence," Pelosi said. "Our troops are at risk until that is done, and yet, there is no sense of urgency to undertake a thorough review of what went wrong. Neither the issue of the quality of the intelligence nor the equally important issue of whether intelligence was politicized, have been investigated by this Congress."

Citing the absence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, evidence of the Bush Administration's efforts to discredit critics of the Iraq war, prisoner abuses at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, Guantanamo, and Afghanistan, and the responsibility of Congress to oversee the decisions and actions of other branches of government, Pelosi demanded investigative action by the Republican Congress.

Falling, Falling, Falling

39%:

President George W. Bush's job approval rating fell to 39 percent, the lowest number since he took office, in a Zogby International poll taken after the indictment of an administration adviser in the CIA leak case and the withdrawal of another aide as a Supreme Court nominee.

The number is down from two weeks ago, when 45 percent of U.S. adults said they approved of the job Bush was doing. Public approval of Bush's leadership had been on the rebound since hitting a low after criticism of the government's slow reaction to Hurricane Katrina in the first week of September.

``The 39 percent job performance is the lowest we have registered so far for Mr. Bush,'' pollster John Zogby said in a statement. ``Behind those numbers are some troubling trends for his party.''

The approval rating number is in line with other recent polls by USA Today/CNN/Gallup, the Washington Post/ABC News

Texas Southern Baptists ♥ Hate and Bigotry

I feel dirty just having read this, but it's true. Tolerance, and teaching our children tolerance, has no place in the Southern Baptist lifestyle:

"There are other agendas, particularly the homosexual agenda, that have been very aggressive in promoting tolerance of what we consider to be destructive and unbiblical lifestyles -- and building that tolerance into our children," Ledbetter contends. "And they're finding a listening ear. Whether it's on the Supreme Court, or whether it's the textbook manufacturers, the National Education Association -- we find ourselves up against some pretty big boys."

The goal of the public school resolution is to put the responsibility for educating children in the hands of the parents where it belongs, Ledbetter adds. Now that more believing parents are becoming wary of what is being taught in public schools, he says these Christian moms and dads are looking to take a proactive response.

Because, you know, that tolerance thing is so evil.

We are all going to hell for not adequately hating homosexuals.



Thanks to Pam Spaulding for the link

Thought for the Day

"Democracy is a device that ensures we shall be governed no better than we deserve."

--George Bernard Shaw

What's Good for the Goose

Is good for the Gander, I guess:

Just days after U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay won a fight to get a new judge in his case, prosecutors on Thursday sought the ouster of a Republican jurist responsible for selecting the new judge.

The legal wrangling comes as administrative Judge B.B. Schraub was expected to name a new judge for DeLay's money laundering and conspiracy case.

Apparently Schraub made political contributions to Republican candidates. Since DeLay made hay about Perkins donating to Democratic causes, I suppose Earle decided to give DeLay a taste of his own medicine.

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Taking Groundhog Day Seriously

Normally I don't like Dan Abrams, but his blog entry from Halloween is pretty good:

Oh, please. How do you explain this one to the kids? Well, honey you can't go to school today as a ballerina because Halloween is not just about candy corn and jack o lanterns. No, it's a far more serious religious holiday…Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice. What world are we living in? If you don't want to have your kids dress up then don't. And you know what else? I hate to break the news to you, but it’s not a real holiday!! People still go to work. It’s kind of like taking Groundhog day seriously.

Sure, if you look back far enough you can trace Halloween rituals to more than just fun and games. But that is not the reality today. The few who still adhere to the origins of the Halloween holiday are a few fringe so-called witches.

What about Valentines Day? After all, February 14 celebrates the martyrdom of a Catholic priest named Valentine who conducted secret marriages. Will parents now insist that their kids not give Valentine cards at school because they might actually be honoring a religious tradition?

Lighten up. These are at worst, Hallmark holidays and at best, just fun. Don't make me come over there and egg and toilet paper your house tonight.

I agree fully.

I had some neighbors who were of the belief that Halloween was evil, because of the "satanic" overtones. Of course, after conversations about Halloween experiences as kids, they kind of saw what was wrong with their position, and changed. They actually ended up becoming quite enthusiastic about Halloween. But it really just highlights how crazy the religious right is getting. Like Dan said, next up is Valentines day. Then probably Groundhog day, probably Grandparents day next because of some far fetched religious tie to that date.

It is long past time to take sanity back.

DeLay Straining Republicans

MSNBC.com:

Former House majority leader Tom DeLay's efforts to retain power despite his indictment have angered some rank-and-file Republicans, many of whom say his ethical problems and uncertain status are staining them and destabilizing GOP unity.

There seems to be a bit of a power struggle brewing within the GOP in Washington.

DeLay is unwilling to relinquish any power, and many have a problem with that. There are those such as Rep. Bass (R-N.H.) who want to elect a new majority leader and get it all over with.

The overriding concern as far as Republicans are concerned, is the '06 elections. With public opinion beginning to swing away from Republicans, they have a rapidly closing window in which to work before they will have passed the point where the question of maintaining their majority is not the problem, but just how bad will they lose next November will be their concern.

We can hope for that, and as long as this disarray continues, along with the new found cojones the Democrats seem to have found, we will be in for a wild ride.

Thought for the Day

"In a mad world only the mad are sane."

--Akira Kurosawa

Up or Down Vote?

Republicans said no.

David Broder:

None of this is to suggest that Judge Alito will be -- or should be -- blocked from elevation to the seat of Sandra Day O'Connor. His record entitles him to the serious consideration and questioning he will undoubtedly receive from the Judiciary Committee. But after Bush acquiesced in the conservative movement's uproar denying Miers her chance for an up-or-down Senate vote, or even a hearing in that committee, there is no plausible way the White House can insist that every major judicial nominee deserves such a vote.

That was the rationale behind the threatened "nuclear option" in the Senate, the mid-session rule change that would have banned judicial filibusters. If the mass of Democrats and a few Republicans who may be dismayed by Alito's stands on abortion and other issues can muster the 41 votes needed to sustain a filibuster under current rules, they now have precedent for using their power.

Cheney Hired Whom?

Another person involved in the bogus WMD claims?

Vice President Dick Cheney replaced I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby as his national security adviser on Monday with an aide identified by a former Iraqi exile group as the White House official to whom it fed information on Iraq that turned out to be erroneous.

The Bush administration relied on some of the information from the Iraqi National Congress to argue that Saddam Hussein had to be ousted before he could give banned biological or chemical weapons to al-Qaida for strikes on the United States.

But no such weapons were discovered after the March 2003 invasion, and U.S. intelligence agencies and the independent commission on the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks found no evidence of operational cooperation between Iraq and al-Qaida.

The White House announced on Monday the elevation of John Hannah to replace Libby as Cheney's national security adviser. Earlier in the day it announced that Libby would be arraigned Thursday in federal court on charges of perjury, making false statements and obstruction of justice. He was expected to plead innocent.

The White House also announced that David S. Addington, who's been Cheney's legal counsel, would assume Libby's duties as chief of staff. Like Hannah, Addington has played a quiet, though influential, role in the vice president's office. The Washington director of Human Rights Watch accused Addington of helping draft policies that led to the abuse of prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The people that Bush and Cheney keep company with are real winners.




Thanks to Kevin Hayden at American Street for the link

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Busy Day

And I apparently have missed some BIG to do's.

Harry Reid just shutdown the Senate

more here

and Bill Frist had a hissy fit

Damn, I hate when my real job gets in the way of the job I wish I had.

You Had to See This Coming

The Worst Jobs in Science

3. Kansas Biology Teacher
On the front lines of science's devolution

"The evolution debate is consuming almost everything we do," says Brad Williamson, a 30-year science veteran at suburban Olathe East High School and a past president of the National Association of Biology Teachers. "It's politicized the classroom. Parents will say their child can't be in class during any discussion of evolution, and students will say things like 'My grandfather wasn't a monkey!'"

First, a history lesson. In 1999 a group of religious fundamentalists won election to the Kansas State Board of Education and tried to introduce creationism into the state's classrooms. They wanted to delete references to radiocarbon dating, continental drift and the fossil record from the education standards. In 2001 more-temperate forces prevailed in elections, but the anti-evolutionists garnered a 6-4 majority again last November. This year Intelligent Design (ID) theory is their anti-evolution tool of choice.

Sending Jim Crow Away

Georgia Law Struck Down:

In a case that some have called a showdown over voting rights, a U.S. appeals court yesterday upheld an injunction barring the state of Georgia from enforcing a law requiring citizens to get government-issued photo identification in order to vote.

The ruling allows thousands of Georgians who do not have government-issued identification, such as driver's licenses and passports, to vote in the Nov. 8 municipal elections without obtaining a special digital identification card, which costs $20 for five years. In prior elections, Georgians could use any one of 17 types of identification that show the person's name and address, including a driver's license, utility bill, bank statement or a paycheck, to gain access to a voting booth.

Last week, when issuing the injunction, U.S. District Judge Harold L. Murphy likened the law to a Jim Crow-era poll tax that required residents, most of them black, to pay back taxes before voting. He said the law appeared to violate the Constitution for that reason. In the 2004 election, about 150,000 Georgians voted without producing government-issued identification.

Can we just say it, and get it out in the open?

Republicans don't want the poor and minorities to vote. By all appearances they want only white landholders to be able to vote.





Thanks to Holden at First Draft for the link.

Conservatives Say Cancer Better Than Prevention

Disgusting:

"I've talked to some who have said, 'This is going to sabotage our abstinence message,' " said Gene Rudd, associate executive director of the Christian Medical and Dental Associations. But Rudd said most people change their minds once they learn more, adding he would probably want his children immunized. Rudd, however, draws the line at making the vaccine mandatory.

This is what the entire debate comes down to?

We have a vaccine that can prevent cervical cancer, yet because the virus that can lead to a woman getting cervical cancer (ignoring all other reasons), is transmitted sexually, it is more important that girls not get the vaccine, for fear that someone will interpret the vaccine as a greenlight to sex?

How twisted these Conservative groups have become.

And hyprocritical too, since Mr. Rudd above said he would get his children immunized.

Thought for the Day

"A paranoid is someone who knows a little of what's going on."

--William S. Burroughs

Moon the Klan

The KKK is coming to Austin for a rally on Saturday 5 November.

They are coming to show their support for the Gay Marriage Amendment that Texas is voting on, and to scare conservatives with the insidious threat of homosexuals recruiting their sons and daughters.

In response, a group is trying to get a moon the Klan rally:

It would be easy to give them what they want.
It would be easy to shake my fist and holler.
It will be harder to shake my ass in their general direction,
but it will be better than feeding into their media strategy.
You are invited to join in
the 2nd* Austin Mooning of the Klan
Saturday, November 5th
Austin City Hall (or nearby depending on where the police make us stand)
from 1-3PM
*The first mooning of the Klan was organized by Texas musician Steve Fromholz in 1993 and proved to be an effective means of making counter protesters smile and Klanspeople cringe.

John Kelso writes about the upcoming event:

You ever wonder how happily married the Klan guys are? Notice how you never see a calendar called Girls of the KKK? Hey, if you're a fat girl with no teeth, wouldn't you want to walk around under a bedsheet?

So I'm glad some people are talking about dropping their Dockers at this event (1 to 3 p.m. Saturday) thus becoming the butt of the joke.

Besides, there's a precedent. In 1993 a group of mooners boarded a bus at the Saxon Pub on South Lamar, then proceeded to the Capitol grounds, where they mooned a Klan rally. But the Saxon Pub mooners didn't get organized as a bloc mooning. You had a butt here, a butt there. It was kind of half-, uh, never mind.

I would arrange 100 to 150 people like a card section at a football game. That way you could write a different word on each cheek to spell out, say, one of Shakespeare's sonnets, or the lyrics to a Neil Young song, like, say, "Harvest Moon."

This would get the idea across that we here in Austin, Texas, don't sit on our butts when meanness marches into town. And a humorous gesture might take the edge off. In fact, the '93 mooning did just that. It started with Klan-haters banging their fists in anger on the front of the KKK bus when it showed up.

But things lightened up when the pants came down. At least briefly.

Teaching Girls They are Inferior

so says the American Family Association:

Two national groups - the Pro-Life Action League in Chicago and the American Family Association in Tupelo, Miss. - have raised questions about the American Girl brand and its parent company, Mattel Inc., because of the company's fund-raising for Girls Inc., formerly known as Girls Clubs of America.

The American Family Association has called Girls Inc. "a pro-abortion, pro-lesbian advocacy group." Girls Inc., which has more than 1,500 centers across the country, says it provides a variety of programs to educate and encourage girls and does accept lesbian sexual orientation. Alexander Kopelman, director of communications, said it does not include abortion in its programming, though it does not control what leaders say if girls ask about it.

Because, you know, if girls want to be educated, they shouldn't be.

Girls shouldn't be taught to be tolerant of others.
Girls shouldn't be taught about anything that might encourage them to be independent.
Girls shouldn't be allow out of the home.

Girls Inc. is a very subversive organization. I can under stand why the AFA would be afraid of them. From their information page:
To all friends of strong, smart, and bold girls:

Girls Inc. has empowered girls for over 141 years, first as Girls Clubs of America and since 1990 as Girls Incorporated. In centers across the country, generations of girls have learned their strengths, explored their worlds, prepared for productive, interesting lives, and offered each other the support necessary in dealing with the challenges of growing up.

Grounded in research and tested in the field, Girls Inc. programs address the whole girl. They build her athletic skills and competitive spirit, nurture her ability and interest in science, math and technology, equip her with critical health and sexuality information, provide her leadership experience, teach her media literacy and money management skills, and foster her self-respect and self-determination. Programs such as Girls Inc. Operation SMART®, Girls Inc. Discovery Leadership®, and Girls Inc. Sporting Chance® help girls understand who they are and acquire the skills and knowledge needed to make smart, informed decisions about their lives.

In addition, since 1992 Girls Inc. has provided over $1.8 million in college scholarships to girls who have become leaders in all walks of life and has played a crucial role in advancing girls' rights through supporting legislation such as Title IX and the Violence Against Women Act.

Recently, our mission to help girls develop their self-esteem and self-reliance has become the target of false, inflammatory statements from people who are pursuing a narrow political agenda.

Girls Incorporated stands on its long positive history. The millions of lives we have touched speak for who we are and our values. Thanks to all of you who believe in our mission of inspiring girls to be strong, smart, and bold®. Together, we will continue to work to help all girls realize their potential.

Cordially,

Joyce M. Roché
President and CEO
Girls Incorporated

{{{{shudder}}}} Be very afraid.

Putting an Activist Judge on the Bench

The Facts: Alito is an activist judge:

In 1995, he voted to invalidate Pennsylvania restrictions on publicly funded abortions for women who are victims of rape or incest. The state wanted the women to have to report the crime to police first, but Alito joined another judge in finding that state rules were trumped by federal policy.

Of course this is but one of the laws he, acting as a judge, sought to overturn.

I don't really need to explain the hypocrisy of the Right, that their attacks on "an out of control judiciary" is because the judiciary does not support their fundamentalist views.

We can see, however, that a nominee like Alito will be likely to defer to and help, through "activist rulings", to enable the Fundamentalists in this country, and further their agenda against abortion, homosexuals and secularism.

I curious as to how quickly the weak-kneed congressional Democrats are going to roll over and let this happen?

Monday, October 31, 2005

Supporting Americans, Republican Style

Why, oh why do we allow Republicans to disenfranchise voters?

Last week, an ugly bit of business transpired in the GOP-dominated House of Representatives, where Republican hard-liners succeeded in passing a measure that would limit the ability of nonprofit groups to conduct voter registration drives. It was one of those moments when you don't have to wonder what the jihadist faction of the GOP is up to: They want to restrict the franchise to people who think as they do.

Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., a veteran of the civil rights movement, said the measure would "take us back to 1964 or 1965. I just think they (Republicans) want to be in a position to stifle the participation of poor people and minorities in the political process. They want to take us back to another period."

Sony v Apple, and the Consumer Loses.

Sony decides that legal use of purchased music is unacceptable if you own an iPod.

At this point I don't think I am going to purchase any more Sony products until they change their policy. I don't have an iPod, but Mrs. David does. Because of Sony's inability to have created a digital audio player (DAP) before Apple, or one as good as Apple, they have decided that their customers who use iPods shouldn't be permitted to listed to their musicians music.

Of course the biggest losers in this are really the artist who creates the music that Sony puts out, but as consumers we lose out as well.

And I was going to purchase a Sony laptop too.

Thought for the Day

"The keenest sorrow is to recognize ourselves as the sole cause of all our adversities."

--Sophocles

Does Alito Think Women are Chattel?

via TBogg:

In Doe v. Groody, Alito agued that police officers had not violated constitutional rights when they strip searched a mother and her ten-year-old daughter while carrying out a search warrant that authorized only the search of a man and his home. [Doe v. Groody, 2004]

Did Alito consider that the "mother and her ten-year-old daughter" were a part of the house, thus covered by the warrant?

Alito Nominated to SCOTUS

Bush nominates Alito to Supreme Court.

Early info seems to indicate that Bush has given the far right exactly what they want. We shall see.

Sunday, October 30, 2005

Thought for the Day

"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia."

--Charles M. Schulz

Republican Priorities

Republicans know which side the bread is buttered

Here is the dry side of the bread:

The House Agriculture Committee approved budget cuts Friday that would take food stamps away from an estimated 300,000 people and could cut off school lunches and breakfasts for 40,000 children.

The action came as the government reported that the number of people who are hungry because they can't afford to buy enough food rose to 38.2 million in 2004, an increase of 7 million in five years. The number represents nearly 12 percent of U.S. households.

"If there are cuts to be made, why should we make them on food stamps?" said Rep. David Scott, D-Ga. "This is the meanest cut of all."

The cuts, approved by the Republican-controlled committee on a party-line vote, are part of an effort by the House GOP to curb federal spending by $50 billion. The food and agriculture cuts would reduce spending by $3.7 billion, including $844 million on nutrition, $760 million on conservation and $212 million on payments to farmers.

Here is the buttered side:
“What was the Republican answer to the hurricanes? More subsidies to the oil industry*,” Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich., said in his party’s weekly radio address.

Dingell said Democrats proposed a “tough anti-price-gouging law” and called for more federal money for research and development of renewable fuels and energy efficiency technologies to try to reduce the country’s need for oil.







Thanks to Kevin at The American Street for the links.

Saturday, October 29, 2005

Cliff May Knows Secret Things

Woah

There were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The mystery is what Saddam Hussein did with them.

Yeah, and I won the lottery too. The mystery there, is what I did with the winning lottery ticket.

Wanker-ific

Ben Stein

It took awhile, but I finally heard somebody on Fox News Channel blame the Democrats for Lewis Libby's indictment for lying to the FBI and a federal grand jury and trying to obstruct the investigation into the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame's name to news reporters. Ben Stein managed to do it on Saturday's (October 29, 2005) "Cavuto on Business" show.

Stein, author of numerous books offering financial advice, kicked off the show with a claim that the five-count felony indictment handed up by a federal grand jury Friday was nothing more than Democrats trying to get even with Bush.

How pathetic.

Thought for the Day

"Bureaucrats write memoranda both because they appear to be busy when they are writing and because the memos, once written, immediately become proof that they were busy."

--Charles Peters

Who is Official A?

and what deal was cut for him to avoid indictment?

Friday's indictment says "Official A" is a "senior official in the White House who advised Libby on July 10 or 11 of 2003" about a chat with Novak about his upcoming column in which Plame would be identified as a CIA employee.

Late Friday, three people close to the investigation, each asking to remain unidentified because of grand jury secrecy, identified Rove as Official A.

I wonder if Karl has made a deal for lesser charges if he testifies?

Is Fitzgerald expecting more information to come out as the Libby trial goes on?

Questions, questions.

Friday, October 28, 2005

Sacrifices

Steve Bell:

Big Time Gave Plame Identity to Libby

From Josh:

On or about June 12, 2003, LIBBY was advised by the Vice President of the United States that Wilson's wife worked at the Central Intelligence Agency in the Counterproliferation Divison. LIBBY understood that the Vice President had learned this information from the CIA.

Bye, Bye, Bye

Scooter Libby, gone:

OCTOBER 28--Vice President Dick Cheney's top aide was indicted today on perjury, false statement, and obstruction of justice charges in connection with a special counsel's probe into the leaking of a CIA officer's identity. A copy of the five-count felony indictment returned against I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Cheney's chief of staff, can be found below. The 55-year-old Libby, a White House power and proponent of the Iraq war, allegedly committed the crimes when questioned by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald before a federal grand jury. During two appearances under oath, Libby was questioned extensively about his contact with several reporters prior to published disclosures about Valerie Plame Wilson, the CIA operative.

Is Karl next?

Thought for the Day

"The wages of sin are unreported."

--Unknown

Why Jonah Goldberg Should Be Shunned

Look at the cover of Jonah's new book:


Never mind that he is dimwitted enough to think that Fascism is a left wing ideology, he uses the symbolism of Hitler on the cover (with Jonah ostensibly being a Jew, no less)

For Jonah's edification, let's review Mussolini's view of Fascism:

Fascism is definitely and absolutely opposed to the doctrines of liberalism, both in the political and economic sphere.

Jonah obviously needs to have a lesson on political ideologies.




Thanks to the Green Knight via the Big Brass Blog

"Coin-gate" Figure Charged

with money laundering:

A major GOP donor was charged with giving thousands of dollars to other people to contribute to President Bush's re-election campaign in an attempt to skirt a $2,000 limit on individual contributions.

Tom Noe, a coin dealer already embroiled in an Ohio state government scandal, was charged in a federal indictment Thursday with illegally funneling $45,400 to the president's re-election bid through two dozen friends and associates.

The "coin-gate" investigation is still ongoing, and Ohio law enforcement officials say charges are planned.

This Doesn't Happen Often

I agree with Ann Coulter?

Thursday, October 27, 2005

AP Gets it Partly Right

Who Killed Meirs Nomination:

Under withering attack from conservatives, President Bush abandoned his push to put loyalist Harriet Miers on the Supreme Court and promised a quick replacement Thursday. Democrats accused him of bowing to the "radical right wing of the Republican Party."

The White House said Miers had withdrawn because of senators' demands to see internal documents related to her role as counsel to the president. But politics played a larger role: Bush's conservative backers had doubts about her ideological purity, and Democrats had little incentive to help the nominee or the embattled GOP president.

They are correct in that the criticism of Meirs was coming from the Right. However, AP seems to be rather dismissive of the Democrats position.

There was substantial criticism of Meirs, and pressure to drop her coming, not so much from Congress, but from those Social Conservative organizations, who want an unambiguous candidate on issues like abortion. The "internal White House documents" claim is, like Bloomberg said below, a face saving excuse.

At this point Democrats need to stay together on this issue, and continue to drive home the point that it was the radical right who torpedoed the nomination, not the Senate Republicans by themselves. Make it clear who Bush is beholden to.

Bloomberg Gets It

Why Meirs Nomination Withdrawn:

Commentators had said in advance of today's developments that a confrontation over White House papers related to Miers would present a face-saving reason to end her nomination.

[...]

`Not Comfortable'

Senate conservatives saw it differently, including Trent Lott of Mississippi, who said he was ``not comfortable'' with Miers and that she ``clearly'' wasn't the most qualified.

``There are a lot more people -- men, women and minorities -- that are more qualified in my opinion by their experience than she is,'' Lott said.

``There is just a lot of angst out there'' among conservatives, freshman Republican Senator John Thune of South Dakota said two days after her nomination. There is ``uncertainty as to where she would come down.''

So why did AP dutifully report that the withdraw was Meirs decision?

First Contraceptives, now Pharmaceuticals?

Atheletes foot creme the work of the devil

Most diseases caused by sin
To make his case, Mr. Clements points to the Biblical figure of Asa, King of Judah, who was afflicted with a disease of the foot. "He only consulted physicians," notes Mr. Clements. "He had a bad case of foot disease, but he didn't seek help from God, and two years later he was dead." Reading about Asa's story and others, says the pharmacist, convinced him that modern medicine probably isn't the answer to the health woes of most Americans. "The physicians may have been able to treat the symptoms of Asa's problem but they couldn't get at the sin that was causing the disease."

On your knees and pray, biatch!

Thought for the Day

“Bloggers claim I was their first pelt, and I believe that. I’ll never read a blog.”

-–Sen. Trent Lott, quoted in the Christian Science Monitor, 10/27/05







Thanks to Think Progress for today's thought.

It Worked on Me

In reference to this from a few days ago, in which I thought that right wing groups were amassing support to vote down the Gay Marriage Amendment, we are treated to an Austin American-Statesman article about who the pastor is whose voice was on the robodial script:

A minister with Austin ties whose voice debuted on Texas answering machines this week urging a vote against a proposed constitutional ban on same-sex marriage says he recorded the message, including a "God bless you," in keeping with his religious convictions.

"I'm not pigeonholed," the Rev. Tom Heger said Wednesday. "I'm just an average Presbyterian pastor who tries to live his faith with integrity and work for justice where appropriate."

There is nothing deceptive about the pre-recorded call. If you read the text of the amendment, they are right. The courts could overturn the ability of the state to sanction and/or recognize a marriage.

Where they got me, is that the group Save Texas Marriage is a spin off of Glen Maxey's No Nonsense in November organization, which is campaigning against the amendment. There was no misrepresentation on the part of Save Texas Marriage, just misunderstanding on my part (that and shock at getting a robodialed call on my answering machine).



Remember, November 8, vote no on Amendment #2.

Ben Sargent on Fitzmas

Ben Sargent

We Need More Lipstick ...

... for this pig:

There are no easy solutions to these problems, nor is there a quick way to end American losses. In fact, one of the greatest dangers of Iraq is that domestic disenchantment with the mission will lead to a premature withdrawal of U.S. troops, a step that would greatly increase the carnage and hand a major victory to this country's foremost enemy, the Islamic extremist movement headed by al Qaeda. Mr. Bush could have avoided much of that disillusionment had he been more honest with the country from the beginning about the likely costs of the

war. Yet even now he refuses to speak candidly about the conflict; he describes it as if it were exclusively a battle between U.S.-backed democrats and foreign terrorists, rather than a complex political and military struggle among Iraqis. He did say on Tuesday that "this war will require more sacrifice, more time and more resolve." As U.S. servicemen continue to give their lives, the president must explain more clearly and more honestly why that is so -- and why it is necessary.

Shorter WaPo:

If you'd just tell us how many soldiers must die, and maybe why, We'll be fine with it.


I suppose that is good enough for WaPo, and many war supporters. But how about a general call from Bush, to sacrifice your children to his cause if you support it? How about Jenna and Barbara enlist to set an example for all to join up and go fight.

Oh Mistress Irony, Must You be so Cruel?

Tom DeLay again?:

Rep. Tom DeLay has notified House officials that he failed to disclose all contributions to his legal defense fund as required by congressional rules.

The fund is currently paying DeLay's legal bills in a campaign finance investigation in Texas, where DeLay has been indicted, and in a federal investigation of Washington lobbyist Jack Abramoff. The lobbyist arranged foreign travel for DeLay and had his clients pay some of the cost.

DeLay, R-Texas, has denied wrongdoing in both cases.

DeLay wrote House officials that he started an audit and it found that $20,850 contributed in 2000 and 2001 to the defense fund was not reported anywhere.

An additional $17,300 was included in the defense fund's quarterly report but not in DeLay's 2000 annual financial disclosure report - a separate requirement. Other donations were understated as totaling $2,800 when the figure should have been $4,450.

Oh, poor Tom. He just cannot seem to get a break these days.

Meirs, Out

Buh-bye:

President Bush on Thursday accepted the withdrawal of Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers, according to a statement from the White House.

In her letter to the president, Miers said she was "concerned that the confirmation process presents a burden for the White House and its staff and it is not in the best interest of the country."

We know that the "executive privelige" claim is just a dodge for the real reason the nomination was withdrawn.

The Religious Right didn't want someone who wouldn't come out an say that she would overturn Roe v Wade. No, they wanted someone who proudly claims that desire. The executive privlige claim is just an easy out.

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Target Claims Pharmacist Civil Rights Violation

Courtesy of Americablog we are treated to the latest excuse Target has given for pharmacists denying emergency contraception to women.

They say they have to accomodate pharmacists religious views under the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

I suppose, now that Target has given their pharmacists carte blanche permission to sue them, they will now have to take the position that it is OK for Evangelical Christians to discriminate against Jews or Muslims as they see fit. It may violate someones civil rights to serve a Jew.

Oy vey.

Fitzmas is Coming

Fitzmas is coming

Are you ready?

Yet Another Bush Agenda Item Falls

Davis-Bacon Act reinstated in Gulf Coast reconstruction:

The Bush administration will reinstate rules requiring that companies awarded federal contracts for Hurricane Katrina pay prevailing wages, usually an amount close to the pay scales in local union contracts.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., was among congressmen critical of the administration's decision to waive the requirement and who met Wednesday with White House chief of staff Andrew Card. He said Card told them the wage requirement would be reinstated Nov. 8.

"We thought it was bad policy and bad politics, and I guess they accepted our argument," King told The Associated Press. "There's no need to antagonize organized labor."

This was a bad idea that apparently didn't even have much support from Republicans.

I think we are witnessing the end of the Bush agenda. This bodes well going into the 2006 election season.


Thanks to Josh Marshall for the breaking news.

Thought for the Day

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it."

--Thomas Jefferson

This Has to be a Nightmare

Big Brass Blog:

"House Democratic leaders are holding a closed-door meeting with members of their caucus this afternoon to discuss a new slogan for the 2006 midterm elections: 'Together, We Can Do Better' or 'Together, America Can Do Better,' according to Democratic sources."

Over the last few weeks, the phrase "has become a common refrain in Democratic leadership statements, usually appearing at the end of Pelosi's press releases or sprinkled liberally in Reid's comments."

I hope no one was paid to come up with that tripe.

Like Shakespeare's Sister said, all this message conveys is that Democrats have nothing better to offer America other than that we are not Republicans. Hardly vote inspiring.

In fact, it's kind of like the CNN v Fox News war. Why watch CNN try to be like Fox News, when you can watch the real thing?

It is starting to sound like Democrats really want to become a permanent minority.

Another Bush Adgenda Item Nixed

No nuke bunker-busters:

The Bush administration is abandoning its push to develop a "bunker-buster" nuclear warhead and instead will pursue a conventional weapon that can penetrate hardened underground targets.

Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., said Tuesday that lawmakers had agreed drop funding for the proposed nuclear bunker-buster from the Energy Department's budget for the 12 months beginning Oct 1. He said the Energy Department had requested the move because it no longer planned to pursue a nuclear bunker-buster.

The decision was hailed by opponents of new nuclear weapons.

It is nice to see that all of the political capital that Bush supposedly had after his "re-election" his finally all spent.

Now, if we could get the Missile Defense Shield killed too?

Don't Go Away Mad ...

... just go away

New York Times reporter Judith Miller has begun discussing her future employment options with the newspaper, including the possibility of a severance package, a lawyer familiar with the matter, said yesterday.

The discussion about her future comes several days after the public rupture of the relationship between the Times and Ms. Miller, a 28-year veteran of the paper. Both the editor and the publisher of the Times have expressed regret for their unequivocal support for Ms. Miller when she spent 85 days in jail for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury investigating the unmasking of a Central Intelligence Agency operative.

Bye-bye Judy.

Can't say I'll miss you.

AssRocket v AssRocket

Keeping the same level of consistency as did Kay Bailey Hutichson when talking about whether perjury is a crime or not, John Hindraker (aka AssRocket), flip-flopped:

John Hinderaker, yesterday:

Tomorrow may bring indictments of Karl Rove and Scooter Libby on charges that can charitably be described as trivial. Tonight, one of our readers urged us to link to President Bush's great speech to the Joint Armed Forces Officers' Wives' group rather than being distracted by the minutiae of the day. Good suggestion.


John Hinderaker, December 17, 1998:

"Like many others, we have been frustrated by the apparent inability of much of the American public to take the Clinton scandals seriously. "It's not about sex," we have patiently repeated to our benighted friends. "It's about perjury. It's about obstruction of justice. The sex is only incidental. At most it was the motive for the crimes. You wouldn't think murder was unimportant just because the motive for the murder was sex, would you?" So goes our argument."

The right is flipping and flopping so quickly these days, there is a stiff breeze coming from that direction.

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Wal-Mart Apparently Likes to be Sued

Nathan Newman shows us that Wal-Mart really wants a Americans with Disabilities Act lawsuit.

From an internal Wal-Mart memo obtained by the NY Times:

To discourage unhealthy job applicants, [the memo] suggests that Wal-Mart arrange for "all jobs to include some physical activity (e.g., all cashiers do some cart-gathering)."...

"It will be far easier to attract and retain a healthier work force than it will be to change behavior in an existing one," the memo said. "These moves would also dissuade unhealthy people from coming to work at Wal-Mart."

I wonder who from the Bush administration has gone to work in the Wal-Mart PR department (or maybe it was the other way around?).

Texas Gay Marriage Amendment

Opposition to the Texas Gay Marriage Amendment is coming from odd quarters today.

When I cam home to get the kids from school, there was a message on my phone.

It was a recorded message from some pastor of some church, presumably around Austin somewhere.

It was urging people to vote against the amendment because Rick Perry and the state legislature made a blunder. The language is thus:

(a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman
(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage

Basically, if this amendment passes, the states ability to sanction any marriage can be nullified if anyone challenges the state's right to give legal status to a marriage.

The Right is all up in arms because a "greedy insurance company, tricky divorce lawyer, or Liberal Austin Activist Judge" (the words used on my answering machine) could use these words to overturn "traditional marriage".

This gives me hope that this amendment will go down. Of course it will resurrect itself in another less acceptable form, but I will take what I can get, for now.

Early voting is open now, be sure to do what the religious right wants.

Vote against Proposition 2. The Religious Right commands it.

I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up

Poor, poor Tom DeLay:

Based on what you know right now, do you think Tom DeLay should remain in his position as House Majority Leader? Do you think he should resign as House Majority Leader but remain a member of Congress? Or do you think he should completely resign from Congress?:

Remain Leader: 36%
Resign Leadership: 19%
Resign From Congress: 42%
Not Sure: 3%

That's what I like to see.


Thanks to kos for the link.

Irony Makes for a Wicked Mistress

Tom DeLay and Irony seem to be meeting in some of the most inconvenient places these days.

First, courtesy of Think Progress DeLay appears in court. But when he arrives in Austin Mistress Irony steps out of the wings:

DeLay's staff disclosed that he flew to Houston on Thursday morning on a corporate jet owned by R.J. Reynolds, a longtime contributor that has flown him to Puerto Rico and other destinations; they said the jet was "used in compliance with regulations." The company, which has also given $17,000 to DeLay's legal defense fund, did not comment Friday.

When he arrived, DeLay gave a press conference and called the allegations of corporate money used to improperly influence the political process "contrived and baseless"

Mistress Irony's next public visit to Monsieur DeLay came, courtesy of Raw Story:
Indicted Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas) bid on a wicker basket two weekends ago at the Needville Harvest Festival in Fort Bend County in his home state. And he won not just the basket, but the gadget inside it, too -- a paper shredder, Roll Call's Mary Anne Akers reports Tuesday. Excerpts.

The shredder purchase would have perhaps remained a secret if DeLay's potential 2006 Democratic opponent, Nick Lampson, hadn't gleefully spilled the beans at a fundraiser last week. A national political reporter was also on hand at the festival to witness the basket/shredder bid. (So stay tuned for more details, including how much the Hammer paid for the shredder.)

I wonder where Mistress Irony will appear next?

Thought for the Day

"Things are more like they are now than they have ever been."

--Gerald R. Ford

Booming Economy?

Not really:

Consumer confidence unexpectedly fell to a two-year-low in October as high energy prices and two devastating hurricanes left Americans feeling unsettled.

The Conference Board's consumer confidence index fell to 85 from 87.5 in September, the New York-based research group said today. The gauge averaged 98.4 during the past five years. It may fall again after Hurricane Wilma tore through Florida yesterday, leaving behind as much as $10 billion in insured losses.

[...]

The component of the index that tracks consumers' expectations for the next six months decreased to 69.5, the lowest since March 2003, from 72.3. The gauge of optimism about the present situation fell to 108.2 from 110.4.

The share of consumers that said jobs were hard to get rose to 25.3 percent this month from 25 percent in September. The share who said jobs were plentiful in October rose to 20.8 percent compared with 20.7 percent the prior month.

The share of consumers expecting to buy a home declined to 2.7 percent, the lowest since November 2004, from 3.4 percent. The percentage who plan to purchase major appliances fell to 24.1 from 28.4. The percentage of those who expect to buy a car rose to 6.1 from 5.8.

[...]

``People in the Midwest are already worried over how much their home heating bills are set to rise this winter,'' Batt said in an interview Oct. 20. ``The economy is going to be in deep yogurt when they start actually getting those bills. If we have a cold winter, confidence in this region could go even lower.''

Households that use heating oil can expect to pay $378 more this winter than a year ago, a 32 percent increase, according to Energy Department forecasts. Those in the Midwest may spend $500 more.

Looking good, isn't it.

This is Just Silly

Not the words I would have used, but it gets the point across:

Conservatives overreacted when they threatened to boycott doll-maker American Girl over its contributions to a youth group that supports abortion rights, U.S. Sen. Barack Obama said Monday.

"It's just silly," said Obama, D-Ill. "This is a classic example of overreaction and a lack of proportion."

If the AFA wants to continue its silly boycotts. Let it.

It just shows how the AFA is more about ensuring that women are kept subservient to men, and ensuring that the lessons girls are taught, reinforce that notion.

Times Newsroom War Continues

The internal war between Judith Miller, and the NY Times continues.

This time it was Keller firing the first shot:

Executive Editor Bill Keller said in an e-mail to staffers Friday that Miller appeared to have misled editors about her conversations with Libby. Columnist Maureen Dowd, meanwhile, wrote on Saturday that editors had been unable to control Miller.

Never mind that by all appearances, Keller had no real desire to stop Miller from doing her thing.

Judy fired back:
"Now I ask you: Why would I - the supposedly pushiest, most competitive reporter on the planet - not have pushed to pursue a tantalizing tip like this?" Miller wrote.

While she and Abramson have different recollections, Miller wrote that "without explanation ... you said you believed her and raised questions about my `trust and credibility.' That is your right. But I gave my recollection to the grand jury under oath."

I don't know which is more fun to watch.

Judy trying to salvage what is left of her reputation (sullied as it it), or Keller tying to salvage what is left of the reputation of the NY Times.

Monday, October 24, 2005

Rape Victim: 'Morning After' Pill Denied

This is beyond the pale

The short version is that a woman in Tuscon, Arizona was sexually assaulted.

It took her 3 days, calling 50 pharmacies to find the morning after pill.

When she found one pharmacy that stocked it, she was told that they wouldn't dispense the medication to her unless she could get there in 10 minutes (she was more than 10 minutes away). And the Planned Parenthood office neglected to inform her that they would have helped with the $70 they charged for the medication.

I've said it before, and I will say it here again.

If you are a pharmacist, and you have a moral objection to dispensing some medications, get over it, or find another job. You are not pharmacists to pass judgement on your customers. You are pharmacists to dispense medications to those who need them. Moral objections are not a part of the medication interaction warnings.

Vindication!

Horns #1

I know most sports journalists, and commentators don't think that Texas deserves to be #1. However, this year is UT's year. I feel it.





Hook 'em!

Thought for the Day

"The best car safety device is a rear-view mirror with a cop in it."

--Dudley Moore

Excellent career opportunity for Boy Genius

get your resumes updated:

Excellent career opportunity!!!

Seeking Deputy White House Chief of Staff to take over all United States domestic affairs! Run the entire country from your office in the West Wing. Direct and instruct POTUS, CIA, and top journalists (NYT, Time, etc.) on all issues of national importance.

You must have excellent contacts with evangelical Christians, NASCAR fans, true patriots, and angry white males. You are equally friendly with billionaire corporate raiders, oil barons, and godless capitalists.

The ideal candidate is very comfortable speaking exclusively on "deep background" and avoiding public appearances. You are the kind of person who does not have to say anything publicly -- you make journalists, folks at town hall meetings, and American troops say it for you.

Note: We will only consider applicants with a flair for dramatic and patriotic settings, including but not limited to aircraft carriers, Mount Rushmore, Ground Zero, rustic ranches, and well lit statues (Liberty, Andrew Jackson, etc.). Need to be skilled at supervising POTUS bike rides, brush clearing, video conferences, and segway rides.

Experience with push polling and direct mail a plus.

Job may start as soon as NEXT WEEK!!!! Maybe even sooner. Please send your resume and references to president@whitehouse.gov, with "Boy Genius" in the subject line.

Bernanke to Replace Greenspan?

Looks like it:

President George W. Bush was expected to announce on Monday that he has picked top economic adviser Ben Bernanke to succeed Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, a knowledgeable source said.

An announcement was to come at 1 p.m. EDT. Bush told reporters there would be "an announcement soon" on his choice to replace Greenspan, whose 18-year tenure at the Fed runs out on January 31.

He might be OK, except for this little tidbit from 2001:
"Figure 21.6 showed that, following the opening to trade, real wages and employment fall in (a) textiles and rise in (b) software. At that point, wages and job opportunities are much more attractive in the software industry than in textiles. Will this situation persist? Clearly, there is a strong incentive for workers who are able to do so to leave the textile industry and seek employment in the software industry."

-- Principles of Economics, Robert Frank and Ben Bernanke, p. 558, 2001.

He is advising people to seek work in the software industry in 2001, after the computer industry bubble burst?

I suppose if this is the worst he has to account for, then he probably is an acceptable choice, being that he has been appointed by Bush, however time will tell.


Thanks to Max Sawicky for the old link, and who has some more information on him.

Disturbing if True

United Press International:

The CIA leak inquiry that threatens senior White House aides has now widened to include the forgery of documents on African uranium that started the investigation, according to NAT0 intelligence sources.

This suggests the inquiry by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald into the leaking of the identity of undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame has now widened to embrace part of the broader question about the way the Iraq war was justified by the Bush administration.

[...]

Fitzgerald's team has been given the full, and as yet unpublished report of the Italian parliamentary inquiry into the affair, which started when an Italian journalist obtained documents that appeared to show officials of the government of Niger helping to supply the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein with Yellowcake uranium. This claim, which made its way into President Bush's State of the Union address in January, 2003, was based on falsified documents from Niger and was later withdrawn by the White House.

This opens the door to what has always been the most serious implication of the CIA leak case, that the Bush administration could face a brutally damaging and public inquiry into the case for war against Iraq being false or artificially exaggerated. This was the same charge that imperiled the government of Bush's closest ally, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, after a BBC Radio program claimed Blair's aides has "sexed up" the evidence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.

There can be few more serious charges against a government than going to war on false pretences, or having deliberately inflated or suppressed the evidence that justified the war.

Just the thought that the (although forged) documents that were the primary motiviation for the Bush justification for war in Iraq, were created by the Bush administration itself is bordering on incomprehensible.

If this turns out to be true, there needs to be some serious punishment meted out at all levels. Because not only were the reasons for going to war in Iraq manufactured, but the very people who held this up as proof, were knowingly using false evidence, but more than that, they created that false evidence.

Crash and Burn

Ben Sargent

Sunday, October 23, 2005

Hello, I am testing this

Hello, I am testing this mobile blogging thing.

You know, just in case I am struck with inspiration & am not near a computer.

Ain't technology grand?

How Much is Too Much

for Americans to endure?

Ahmad Chalabi, the Iraqi leader accused of giving the Bush administration flawed information about Saddam Hussein's weapons program, will visit Washington in November amid speculation that U.S. officials view him as an acceptable candidate for Iraqi prime minister.

Chalabi, who is now Iraq's deputy prime minister, is expected to meet with Treasury Secretary John Snow next month to discuss the progress of economic reconstruction, a Treasury spokesman said on Sunday.

This man is partly responsible for the quagmire we are in, in Iraq.

That Chalabi is still welcome in the United States, and more importantly, being welcomed by the Bush administration, is an obscenity.

Even worse, Reuters continues to maintain the facade that the intelligence was "flawed"?

There was nothing "flawed" about the intelligence on the non-existent WMD program. It was made up out of whole cloth.

Thought for the Day

"The point of living and of being an optimist, is to be foolish enough to believe the best is yet to come."

--Peter Ustinov

What are the Lessons?

No one in the Bush Administrations seems to know:

"In Vietnam we didn't have the lessons of Vietnam to guide us," says David Halberstam, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of that war. "In Iraq we did have those lessons. The tragedy is that we didn't pay attention to them." Or maybe only our leaders did not. The polls show the American people have turned on this war much more quickly than they did on the war in Vietnam. Of course, they are the ones who pay the price.

Anna Quindlen of Newsweek seems to have grasped the lessons. Many other people seem to have grapsed the lessons.

Maybe the difference is that the Bush administration looked at the Vietnam experience, and took it as a lesson of what to do.

Saturday, October 22, 2005

Thought for the Day

"Those who agree with us may not be right, but we admire their astuteness."

--Cullen Hightower

Coulter ♥ America

Media Girl finds what can only be described as spelling out of Ann Coulter's fantasy America. She let a group of Republicans know what she thinks of the U.S. Constitution:

She [ed: Coulter] also criticized the media for being liberal and Democrats for whining about their rights under the First Amendment.

"They're always accusing us of repressing their speech," she said. "I say let's do it. Let's repress them."

She later added, "Frankly, I'm not a big fan of the First Amendment."

I think, in light of this speech held at a Republican fundraiser, every Republican candidate for office who accepts money from Coulter, or organizations Coulter speaks for, or asks her to speak at a fund raiser, should be labeled as what they are.

Anti-American, Anti-Freedom, and Anti-Constitution.

It is time Democrats started holding all Republicans to account for associating with people like Coulter who advocate very Anti-American things.

Here is one candidate, and his supporter we can start with now:
"She's not very subtle, but I always enjoy her talks," Republican Senate candidate Travis Horn said. "They're very hard hitting, but the truth hurts."

The vice chair of the Alachua County Republican Executive Committee Bryan Harman said the unexpectedly large turnout was wonderful, and he enjoyed Coulter's fiery speech.

MoDo v Judy, Judy, Judy

Unlike Steve Gilliard, this wasn't enough to make me shell out $50 to read. Based on Steve's translation, and excerpting, I am tempted:

Ok, after calling her [ed:Judith Miller] a drama queen and a whore, tropism being a fancy word for women who likes powerful men and fucks them, she then goes after her bosses for not supervising her and letting her hurt the paper.

Then she suggests that Miller's jail stint had other motives.

Then, finally, calls for her to be fired.

And Gail Collins might as well have cosigned it.

Why? It ran on the op-ed page, she's her nominal boss.

There seems to be a newsroom war heating up in the NY Times offices.

I can only imagine what Keller and Sulzberger are feeling about now.

Friday, October 21, 2005

Friday Bug Blogging

In honor of Tom DeLay having to come to Austin for his trial, I thought I would simultaneously recognize his visit, and his career before he was elected to congress.

To whit, the Dung Beetle:



You can learn about the Dung Beetle here.

DeGuerin Tells More Untruths?

Can't Be:

According to MoveOn’s Washington director Tom Mattzie, this claim is false. Mattzie told ThinkProgress this morning that MoveOn has “never sold any t-shirts with Tom DeLay’s mug shot” on their website or otherwise.

Shocking, I say.

Shocking!

Thought for the Day

"Originality is the fine art of remembering what you hear but forgetting where you heard it."

--Laurence J. Peter

O'Reilly versus the Dallas Morning News

Apparently Bill O'Reilly is upset with the Dallas Morning News over this column by Macarean Hernandez.

Why would 'ol Billy be so upset, that he would be telling his viewers to cancel their subscription to this news paper?

Perhaps because Ms. Hernandez wrote this:

Were the complainers angrier about the red, white and green Mexican flag fluttering in the Georgia air than they were about the horrific murders? Do they watch Fox's The O'Reilly Factor, where the anchor and the callers constantly point to the southern border as the birth of all America's ills? (Sample comment: "Each one of those people is a biological weapon.")

in a column about 6 Mexican farm workers who were beaten to death in Georgia. That wasn't all the individuals did, but Ms. Hernandez pointed this out as a part of what appears to be a growing trend of violence against Mexicans, and Mexican-Americans in the US. When people like Billy go on a tirade against the "Mexican Threat", some of those who listen; act.

Sadly, we can probably expect to see more of this in the southern US, particularly in Texas where whites are now a minority, and many don't like it. People like Bill O'Reilly need to accept that fact, and stop trying to incite his listeners.

Thursday, October 20, 2005

Texans, Vote Against Gay Marriage Ban Nov. 8

Ben Sargent

The Big Bad Wolf

What is it that has gotten this person in such a tizzy?

This opinion piece written by the chairwoman of the Republican Party of Texas, Tina J. Benkiser.

She goes after Earle for his investigation of Tom DeLay, selectively picking and choosing from his past what is important to mention, and ignoring those "inconvenient" facts. Ms. Benkiser even goes so far as to call for the resignation of Ronnie Earle.

In the end though, Ms. Benkiser gets one thing right:

Something to consider: In the popular fable, the big bad wolf fails at his first attempts to get his desired target. He huffs and puffs and gets nowhere, but rather than giving up and pursuing other endeavors, he becomes even more obsessed and zealous.

In the wolf's arrogant zeal, he decides to enter the house by sliding down the chimney -- and unexpectedly lands in a pot of boiling water. It is a happy ending. It is the end of the big bad wolf.

Only this paragraph should have been written about Tom DeLay, and not Ronnie Earle.

DeLay Mug Shot

Looks like a class picture

Your're Doing a Heckuva Job Brownie

Sutnning:

Marty Bahamonde, a FEMA regional director, told a Senate panel investigating the government's response to the disaster that he gave regular updates to people in contact with then-FEMA Director Michael Brown as early as Aug. 28, one day before Katrina made landfall.

In most cases, he was met with silence. In an Aug. 29 phone call to Brown informing him that the first levee had broke, Bahamaonde said he received a polite thank you from Brown, who said he would check with the White House.

Well, at least he got a polite thank you from Brownie.

And, we now know where Brownie's priorities were:
Less than three hours later, however, Brown's press secretary wrote colleagues to complain that the FEMA director needed more time to eat dinner at a Baton Rouge restaurant that evening. "He needs much more that (sic) 20 or 30 minutes," wrote Brown aide Sharon Worthy.

"We now have traffic to encounter to go to and from a location of his choise (sic), followed by wait service from the restaurant staff, eating, etc. Thank you."




Thanks to Josh Marshall for the link.

DeLay Casualties

The first:

Baxter received money from the Republican National Committee, which has been at the heart of the recent indictments of U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Sugar Land. DeLay and his associates are accused of laundering the money through the Republican group to illegally funnel corporate money to seven Texas legislative candidates, including Baxter.

Baxter was not charged with any wrongdoing.

The Texas Association of Business, which, like DeLay, is under indictment for its involvement in the 2002 elections, also paid for advertisements attacking Baxter's opponent, former Rep. Ann Kitchen, in 2002.

"Probably Todd saw the writing on the wall and the Republican establishment, my assumption is, moved in and said, 'Mr. Baxter, you're not going to win this race and so let's put somebody in there that doesn't have the baggage you have,' " said Chris Elliott, chairman of the Travis County Democratic Party. "But any candidate they put in there, Ben Bentzin or whoever else, is going to be a product of the same Republican establishment that has been inept in the way they run this state."

I wonder how many more casualties there will be?

Thought for the Day

"Crime does not pay ... as well as politics."

--Alfred E. Newman

Cohen Still Doesn't Know What He is Talking About

Oy:

That right of privacy, first enunciated in 1965 in Griswold v. Connecticut, once made sense. It overturned a state law forbidding the use of contraceptives by married couples. The average person could easily understand that a right of privacy was at issue here. If the government telling you what you can and cannot do in your own bedroom is not about privacy, then what is? The Connecticut law had to go. If the state legislature wasn't going to take it off the books, then the court had to.

Abortion is a different matter. It entails so much more than mere birth control -- issues that have roiled the country ever since the Roe decision was handed down in 1973 -- and so much more than mere privacy. As a layman, it's hard for me to raise profound constitutional objections to the decision. But it is not hard to say it confounds our common-sense understanding of what privacy is.

Griswold v Conn. is about privacy, that is true.

But, Roe v Wade was about the right of a woman to obtain a medical procedure in consultation with her doctor, without government intervention.

How is that not a privacy issue?

Now that we know Cohen is one of the anti-abortion supporters (despite his claim to the contrary), we then can put his argument in the proper context. By attempting to argue that Roe is not about privacy (which it clearly is), he is trying to make the case that it has to be overturned, because, well, let me use Cohen's own incoherent words:
If a Supreme Court ruling is going to affect so many people then it ought to rest on perfectly clear logic and up-to-date science. Roe, with its reliance on trimesters and viability, has a musty feel to it, and its argument about privacy raises more questions than it answers. For instance, if the right to an abortion is a matter of privacy then why, asked Princeton professor Robert P. George in the New York Times, is recreational drug use not? You may think you ought to have the right to get high any way you want, but it's hard to find that right in the Constitution. George asks the same question about prostitution. Legalize it, if you want -- two consenting adults, after all -- but keep Jefferson, Madison and the rest of the boys out of it.

He is saying here is that if Roe is allowed to stand, then anti-drug, and anti-prostitution laws are unconstitutional? At least that is what I think he is saying, and it also seems that he is making a case to overturn Griswold as well.

I am trying to understand what Cohen's point is (other than he wants to see Roe overturned), but the only thing I can get out of it, is that he wants to bash Liberals for continuing to support Roe v Wade when he no longer does.

Gee. I've Been Told America is More Conservative

Then how do you explain this?

A new Harris Interactive poll that measures support for each of 12 different health-care policies, programs or practices, finds significant public support for a range of issues ranging from the conventional to more controversial.

The online survey of 2,242 U.S. adults found an overwhelming majority (96%) of Americans "strongly" or "somewhat" favor Medicare, the medical assistance program for the elderly and disabled, while 91% say they support Medicaid, the program to assist people with very low incomes.

Not only 96% in favor of Medicare, but 75% support Universal Healthcare and 70% support Stem-Cell Research.

Sounds to me like the commie-pinko Liberals are in charge.

Now, if only those commie-pinko Liberals would vote for a Democrat, then we could prove it.